Essential Technical SEO Tools: Checkers & Diagnostics

Technical SEO checkers matter because they target the small set of site attributes that have outsized impact on discoverability and SERP feature eligibility. In practice, five high‑leverage checks account for most technical risk: structured data (schema), indexability, Core Web Vitals (page speed), redirects/HTTP status, and cached snapshots. Problems in these areas block Google from finding and understanding pages, prevent eligibility for rich results, and degrade user experience metrics that feed into ranking algorithms.

What this guide covers (scope, tools, and expected outputs)

  • Scope: practical, actionable checks you can run with public tools and common crawlers. We focus on tests that return deterministic outputs you can interpret and act on: Rich Results Test, Google Search Console URL Inspection, PageSpeed Insights / Lighthouse, redirect checkers, and Google Cache. For scale or continuous testing we discuss Screaming Frog SEO Spider, DeepCrawl, Lighthouse CI, and how to incorporate data from Ahrefs and Semrush for prioritization.
  • Goals: for each target check you will get (a) which tool(s) to run, (b) the exact outputs to expect, (c) how to interpret those outputs for remediation, and (d) an indication of when to escalate from a spot check to a site‑wide crawl or automated monitoring.

Target checks — what you will test and why it matters

  1. Check schema markup (structured data)
  • Why: Structured data enables eligibility for rich results (product snippets, FAQ, recipe, etc.). Errors or missing required properties disqualify pages.
  • Tools: Google Rich Results Test (quick), Screaming Frog with schema extraction (site crawl), and manual inspection in Google Search Console’s Enhancements reports. Ahrefs and Semrush surface pages with JSON‑LD issues at scale.
  • Expected outputs: Rich Results Test returns pass/fail per result type plus a list of errors and warnings (missing required fields, invalid types). Screaming Frog shows occurrences and can export the raw JSON‑LD.
  • Remediation signal: Fix missing required properties first; convert warnings to informational items. Prioritize pages that map to high‑value SERP features.
  1. Google index checker (indexability)
  • Why: If Google can’t index a page, it cannot rank or appear in search features.
  • Tools: Google Search Console URL Inspection (primary), site: queries for quick checks, Screaming Frog/DeepCrawl for large‑scale coverage analysis.
  • Expected outputs: URL Inspection shows coverage status (Indexed / Not indexed / Discovered — currently not indexed), last crawl, canonical selected by Google, and any indexing or AMP issues.
  • Remediation signal: Resolve noindex/robots.txt blocks, canonical conflicts, or soft 404s before addressing ranking or content changes.
  1. Page speed checker (Core Web Vitals)
  • Why: Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP/FID, CLS) are field signals used by Google; lab audits identify technical causes.
  • Tools: PageSpeed Insights (field + lab), Lighthouse (lab, score 0–100), Lighthouse CI for automated regression testing.
  • Expected outputs: PageSpeed Insights provides field (CrUX) metrics when available and lab metrics from Lighthouse with diagnostic items (render‑blocking resources, unused JS, large images). Lighthouse returns a performance score and actionable audits.
  • Remediation signal: Prioritize issues that affect LCP and INP first (largest contentful paint, main‑thread work), then CLS. Use Lighthouse CI to catch regressions in deployment pipelines.
  1. URL redirect checker / website redirect checker
  • Why: Redirect chains, incorrect 301/302 choices, and redirect loops degrade crawl budgets and user experience; they can strip signals like hreflang or structured data.
  • Tools: Online redirect checkers for single URLs, Screaming Frog or DeepCrawl for site‑wide detection.
  • Expected outputs: HTTP status codes (200/301/302/404/5xx), redirect chains (number of hops), and final destination. Screaming Frog flags redirect chains and loops in exportable reports.
  • Remediation signal: Collapse chains to a single 301 where possible, correct incorrect status codes, and remove loops. Prioritize high‑traffic and high‑link‑equity URLs.
  1. Google cache checker (cached snapshots)
  • Why: Google’s cached snapshot shows how Google last rendered a page; discrepancies between the cache and live site can indicate rendering or indexing problems.
  • Tools: Google Cache (via search result “Cached” or URL parameter), Google Search Console’s Live Test (URL Inspection).
  • Expected outputs: Cached snapshot date, HTML rendered by Google, and whether dynamic content is present. Live Test in GSC shows rendering and resource load status.
  • Remediation signal: If the cache is stale or missing dynamic content, investigate blocked resources, JavaScript rendering issues, or indexability blocks.

When to use which tool — concise guidance

  • Single‑URL diagnostics: Rich Results Test (schema), PageSpeed Insights / Lighthouse (performance), Google Search Console URL Inspection (indexing), online redirect checkers, Google Cache.
  • Site‑wide audits: Screaming Frog SEO Spider for fast desktop crawls up to millions of URLs (recommended for freelancers or small sites), DeepCrawl for enterprise‑scale continuous crawling, and combined outputs from Ahrefs / Semrush to prioritize pages by organic traffic or backlinks.
  • Automation and CI: Lighthouse CI for performance regression testing in build pipelines.
  • Prioritization: Use Ahrefs/Semrush to score pages by traffic and links, then run the targeted technical checks on the high‑value subset first.

What you can expect from this guide (deliverables)

  • Step‑by‑step test recipes for each target check with the exact tool commands or settings.
  • A short interpretation checklist for each tool output: what constitutes a blocker, what’s a warning, and typical remediation steps.
  • Use‑case recommendations: for freelancers and small teams we outline a lean stack centered on Screaming Frog + PageSpeed Insights + GSC; for agencies or large sites we show when to add DeepCrawl, Lighthouse CI, and enterprise integrations with Ahrefs/Semrush.

In short: this guide focuses on the five technical checks that move the needle on findability and SERP eligibility, shows you which public and commercial tools to run (Google Search Console, PageSpeed Insights / Lighthouse, Rich Results Test, Screaming Frog, DeepCrawl, Ahrefs, Semrush, Lighthouse CI), and explains how to interpret their outputs so you can prioritize and remediate efficiently.

Ready to try SEO with LOVE?

Start for free — and experience what it’s like to have a caring system by your side.

Start for Free - NOW

Core Checks — overview and one‑page workflow

  • Five core checks to run for any page: 1) Schema (rich results eligibility), 2) Indexability, 3) Core Web Vitals (LCP / INP / CLS), 4) Redirects, 5) Google cache snapshot.
  • Quick workflow (recommended order): Schema → Indexability (Google Search Console URL Inspection) → Core Web Vitals (PageSpeed Insights / Lighthouse) → Redirect audit (Screaming Frog / DeepCrawl) → Google cache verification. Use Ahrefs or Semrush to scale any of these across thousands of URLs; use Lighthouse CI to automate Core Web Vitals in CI.
  1. Schema markup — how to check (JSON‑LD / microdata)
    Step‑by‑step
  1. Extract the markup: Use Screaming Frog SEO Spider or DeepCrawl to crawl and pull structured data fields at scale; for single URLs view page source and search for